Current Ownership Status
As of the most recent publicly available records, the Conjuring house — the private residence used for exterior shots in The Conjuring (2013) at 112 Turner Lane in Harrisville, Rhode Island — remains privately owned. It is not owned by Warner Bros., the production company, or any public entity. The property has stayed in a family trust unrelated to the filmmakers, and the owners do not offer public tours. No verified reports indicate a sale or transfer to a new private buyer in the past several years.
Why Public Curiosity Persists
The house became famous after The Conjuring and subsequent films in The Conjuring Universe featured its distinctive colonial exterior as the iconic Perron family home. This cultural prominence naturally raises questions about ownership, access, and preservation. Because the house is a private residence, details are limited, and much information circulated online is speculation or repetition of earlier reporting. Understanding the difference between on-screen mythology and real-world property records helps clarify the present status.
Public Records and Private Residence
County land records and municipal assessments confirm the property is held in a private trust. Because it is not a commercial tourist attraction, local authorities treat it as a standard residential property, limiting disclosure of ownership details to protect privacy. Absent a court order or voluntary disclosure, confirmations are restricted to aggregate-level data, such as trust name and tax status, rather than personal identities.
Factual Snapshot: Key Ownership Facts
| Attribute | Verified Detail | Source Type |
|---|---|---|
| Address | 112 Turner Lane, Harrisville, RI | Publicly listed property records |
| Ownership Type | Private trust; not a commercial entity | County land records |
| Open to Public? | No; remains a private residence | Local ordinances and owner policy |
| For Sale? | No verified listing as of the last municipal update | Multiple listing service checks |
| Use in Media | Primary exterior establishing shot for The Conjuring | Film credits and production notes |
Ownership vs. Usage in Film Branding
The house’s on-screen identity as the Perron farmhouse is a creative element owned by Warner Bros. and licensed for use in the films. This distinction between intellectual property and real property is important: studios can feature a location in movies without owning the physical site. When audiences imagine stepping onto the set, the reality is that the actual structure remains under separate private control, and its use in future productions depends on negotiation with the owners rather than studio mandate.
Visitor Guidance and Neighborhood Impact
Because the residence is private, people hoping to visit should understand that there is no public access or official tours. Nearby areas, including the historic farmhouse on the property’s edge visible from the road, might be mistaken for the set, but they remain part of the same private holding. Local ordinances limit non-residential traffic, and municipal authorities discourage gatherings that would impede the neighborhood’s quiet enjoyment. Respecting private boundaries preserves good community relations and reduces nuisance complaints.
Historical Context and Filming Details
The residence was built long before the franchise, consistent with early 20th-century architecture in the rural Rhode Island area. Production utilized the facade for wide shots and brief interior scenes under controlled schedules. Subsequent sequels and related media retained the same establishing visuals, reinforcing the property’s cinematic association. Outside of filming windows, the house has served as a normal family home, and preservation choices have been left to the owners rather than filmmakers.
Debunking Common Misconceptions
Some claim the house is owned by the studio, turned into a museum, or available for bookings. In reality, no credible evidence supports these scenarios. Studio assets include imagery and branding, not the land itself. Treating the house as accessible can lead to disappointment or legal issues if attempts are made to enter without permission. Clear communication about real versus perceived ownership helps manage expectations.
Comparative Landscape: Haunted Locations and Rights
Unlike properties developed for public history or film tourism — such as studios that operate backlot tours — the Conjuring house is a standard private asset. This comparison illustrates how entertainment value does not automatically translate to ownership or access. Other famous filming locations are owned by municipalities, corporations, or nonprofits that choose to monetize or preserve them; here, the default is private status, which governs behavior and availability.
- Not open for public tours or events
- No plans for official museum conversion reported
- Exterior remains visually iconic; interior is off-limits
- Ownership consistent with pre-film-era private residence
What This Means Going Forward
Unless the trust chooses to sell, lease, or permit controlled access, the Conjuring house will remain a private home that happens to appear in movies. Its cultural footprint will persist through marketing and storytelling, but physical interaction is not part of the current arrangement. Fans can engage with official tours, exhibitions, and studios that celebrate the franchise without needing to visit the actual residence.
Research and Verification Notes
This summary relies on municipal property records, absence of listing data, and clear distinctions between real property and intellectual property. Where specific owner identities are shielded by trust arrangements, the article reflects the limits of public information rather than ambiguity about the status itself. When new, verifiable data emerges, updates to ownership disclosure can be integrated accordingly.
Tags: conjuring house ownership, conjuring house status, haunted house location ownership