The University of Memphis Institutional Review Board, or IRB, oversees research involving human participants at the university. This system ensures that studies meet ethical standards and protect participant rights.
Campus leaders rely on a structured decision-making process to review protocols, manage risk, and maintain compliance with federal regulations. The table below summarizes core characteristics of the University of Memphis IRB for quick reference.
| Feature | Description | Contact | Typical Turnaround |
|---|---|---|---|
| Review Type | Exempt, Expedited, Full Board | irb@memphis.edu | 2–10 business days |
| Training Required | CITI modules and annual updates | 901-678-2094 | 5–15 business days |
| Meeting Schedule | Weekly during academic terms | Memphis, TN campus | Varies by submission queue |
| Policy Reference | University Policy 12-017 | Office of Research Support | After approval, ongoing monitoring applies |
Understanding Review Criteria and Protocol Requirements
At the University of Memphis, the IRB evaluates studies based on risk level, participant vulnerability, and data sensitivity. Reviewers apply federal guidelines and university-specific rules to each submission. Researchers must clearly describe procedures, recruitment methods, and consent processes.
Submitting a Research Protocol for Ethical Review
Submitters must use the central portal and provide complete documentation, including informed consent templates and data management plans. Early preparation of forms reduces delays and supports smoother approval cycles. The review team checks alignment with institutional policies before granting permission.
Complying With Federal Regulations and University Standards
Compliance involves ongoing responsibilities, not just initial approval. The IRB monitors studies through periodic reviews and audits to ensure continued adherence. Investigators must report any serious adverse events or protocol deviations promptly. Training helps researchers understand how these requirements apply to their work.
Privacy Protections and Participant Safety Measures
University of Memphis IRB safeguards privacy through de-identification, secure storage, and limited data access. Researchers must detail how they minimize risks and protect sensitive information. These safeguards reinforce trust between the institution, participants, and the broader community.
Enhancing Research Integrity Through Responsible Oversight
Strong oversight encourages rigorous methods, transparent reporting, and respectful engagement with participants. University of Memphis IRB supports researchers by offering guidance, document templates, and feedback loops. Following these practices helps ensure that projects meet ethical expectations and pass review efficiently.
- Complete required training before starting your protocol
- Use accurate participant information sheets and consent forms
- Report adverse events and protocol deviations promptly
- Schedule amendments early to avoid last-minute delays
- Maintain secure records and follow data retention rules
- Coordinate with your department chair for resource access
FAQ
Reader questions
How do I determine if my study qualifies for exempt review at the University of Memphis IRB?
Check federal criteria and complete the pre-review screening tool in the portal. If your project involves minimal risk and exempt categories, you may submit for expedited or exempt determination.
What training is required before submitting a protocol to the University of Memphis IRB?
You must complete CITI human subjects training and any campus-specific modules. Annual refreshers are required to maintain submission eligibility.
How long does it typically take to receive IRB approval at the University of Memphis?
Review times range from two to ten business days, depending on the type of review and submission completeness. Expedited reviews may be faster, while full board meetings add additional time.
What should I do if I need to change my study procedures after approval?
Submit a protocol amendment through the portal for significant changes. Minor clarifications can sometimes be handled via correspondence with the review chair.