Tavon Austin 40 time reflects one of the most scrutinized measurements in modern NFL draft evaluations. This article breaks down how his speed was tested, what the numbers meant for his position, and how the results compare to other receivers at the time.
Below is a structured summary of Austin’s 40 yard sprint performance along with related physical and athletic metrics from his combine and pro day sessions.
| Event | Time (seconds) | Measurement Notes | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forty Yard Dash | 4.36 | Timed electronically at the NFL Combine | Combine 2018 |
| Twenty Yard Split | 2.58 | First 20 yards from a stationary start | Combine 2018 |
| Ten Yard Split | 1.62 | Explosive start phase measurement | Combine 2018 |
| Bench Press | 17 | Repetitions at 225 pounds | Combine 2018 |
| Vertical Jump | 39.5 | Inches measured at the combine | Combine 2018 |
| Broad Jump | 10 feet 3 inches | Horizontal power indicator | Pro Day 2018 |
40 Time Breakdown And Start Mechanics
Examining Tavon Austin 40 time breakdown reveals how his acceleration phase set the tone for the entire run. Scouts paid close attention to his body angle and shin angle during the crucial first ten yards, where his 1.62 split indicated a quick lift-off.
The middle portion of the forty yards showed his ability to maintain velocity without decelerating, a key factor for route runners in the NFL. His 20 yard split of 2.58 suggested efficient sprint mechanics and minimal energy leaks at top speed.
Position Specific Speed Profile
At the receiver position, straight line speed is only part of the equation, and this section contextualizes Austin 40 time within the broader speed profile required for route running and contested catches.
His performance was evaluated alongside change of direction metrics, allowing teams to compare his athleticism against other receivers who might trade straight line bursts for fluid agility.
Combine Versus Pro Day Numbers
Differences between combine and pro day results often highlight how athletes peak under varying conditions, and Tavon Austin 40 time was no exception.
By comparing official combine data with his later pro day performances, evaluators could assess whether his speed was consistent or if he showed improvement after additional coaching and preparation.
How 40 Time Influences Draft Position
Front offices rely on measurable traits like the forty yard dash to project how a skill player fits into complex offensive systems, and Austin’s time played a role in shaping draft board conversations.
While raw speed does not guarantee success at the next level, it can impact a team’s willingness to select a receiver earlier than traditional rankings might suggest.
Key Takeaways And Evaluation Criteria
- Forty yard dash time is just one component of a receiver’s athletic profile.
- Quick first step and efficient sprint mechanics boosted Austin’s early acceleration numbers.
- Combine and pro day results should be reviewed alongside route running precision and contested catch ability.
- Speed measurements gain context when compared to positional averages and competition at the same draft year.
- Teams balance straight line speed with other traits such as frame size, ball skills, and awareness.
FAQ
Reader questions
How does Tavon Austin 40 time compare to other receivers drafted around him?
His 4.36 second time placed him in the mid range for wide receivers at the 2018 NFL Draft, behind elite speed guys but competitive with slot focused receivers who rely more on agility than pure top end velocity.
Did weather or track conditions affect his 40 time at the combine?
No, the conditions were within allowable limits and the timing system was calibrated, so the 4.36 is considered a clean measurement of his athletic performance on that day.
What part of his 40 time did scouts find most impressive?
His twenty yard and forty yard splits indicated strong acceleration through the intermediate zone, a trait valued for receivers who need to turn upfield quickly after the catch.
Did he ever run a faster forty at any point in his college or pro career?
Some shorter sprints in college and at his pro day showed comparable or slightly quicker numbers, but the combine mark remains the standardized benchmark used for evaluation.