Search Authority

Solve 3 More Than 7x Is Less Than 26: Easy Step-by-Step Solution

Translating everyday language into algebra helps clarify constraints in budgeting, shopping, and planning. The phrase 3 more than the product of 7 and a number x is less than 26...

Mara Ellison
Solve 3 More Than 7x Is Less Than 26: Easy Step-by-Step Solution

Translating everyday language into algebra helps clarify constraints in budgeting, shopping, and planning. The phrase 3 more than the product of 7 and a number x is less than 26 describes a linear inequality that appears in many simple comparison situations.

Converting the statement into symbols produces 7x + 3

Phrase Part Algebraic Expression Meaning Example Value
a number x x Unknown value we are solving for 2
the product of 7 and x 7x Multiplication of 7 by the unknown 14
3 more than the product 7x + 3 Add 3 to the previous result 17
is less than 26 7x + 3 Complete inequality describing the constraint True for x = 2

Solve the Inequality Algebraically

Step by Step Solution

To find acceptable values for x, subtract 3 from both sides to obtain 7x

Any number smaller than 23/7 keeps the original statement true, while numbers equal to or greater than 23/7 make the inequality false.

Interpret in Real World Contexts

Applying the Constraint to Practical Situations

In finance, this inequality might represent a scenario where a base fee of 3 is added to seven times the quantity of items, and the total must remain under a budget of 26.

In scheduling, the expression could describe a workload where fixed setup time combines with variable processing time, and the overall time must stay below a threshold.

Graph the Solution on a Number Line

Visualizing the Range of Acceptable Values

The boundary point at 23/7 is not included, so the graph uses an open circle and shading extends to the left toward negative infinity.

Shading the number line in this direction shows that every tested value in the region satisfies 7x + 3

Test Integer Values Near the Boundary

Check Neighboring Numbers to Confirm the Cutoff

Testing x = 3 gives 7(3) + 3 = 24, which is less than 26, so 3 is acceptable.

Testing x = 4 gives 7(4) + 3 = 31, which is not less than 26, so 4 is not allowed.

Key Takeaways and Recommendations

  • Convert phrases into precise algebraic inequalities before solving.
  • Use inverse operations carefully, reversing inequality signs only when multiplying or dividing by negatives.
  • Verify solutions by testing boundary and nearby values.
  • Interpret results in the context of the original problem domain.

FAQ

Reader questions

What does the variable x represent in this statement?

It stands for any unknown number that, when multiplied by 7 and increased by 3, must still keep the total below 26.

Can x be a negative number here?

Yes, negative numbers satisfy the inequality because they produce results well below the limit of 26.

Is x = 23/7 a valid solution?

No, because 23/7 makes the expression equal to 26, and the statement requires a strict less than relation.

How would the inequality change if it were 3 less than the product instead?

It would become 7x - 3 < 26, shifting the boundary point and allowing slightly larger values of x up to 29/7.

Related Reading

More pages in this topic cluster.

Who Designed the Nike Logo? The Story Behind the Swoosh

The Nike swoosh is one of the most recognizable symbols in the world, but few people know the story behind its creation. This piece explores who designed the Nike logo, why it h...

Read next
What is the World's Hottest Pepper? 🌶️🔥

When people ask about the world's hottest pepper, they usually mean the variety that currently holds the Guinness World Record and pushes the boundaries of capsaicin heat. Peppe...

Read next
Jon Huertas in This Is Us:角色, 出演时期与剧情影响详解

Jon Huertas 在《这就是我们》中饰演成年 Kevin Pearson,这一角色从2016年首播持续至2022年最终季,构成了剧集核心家庭叙事的重要组成部�...

Read next