Richard Kiel, recognized widely for his towering stature and roles in film, was married to Jacqueline Perrault from 1960 until his death in 2014. They are the parents of a daughter, whose name and experiences remain largely outside public media attention. This article presents the facts that are reliably documented in authoritative sources, including marriage records, census data, and limited biographical references. Where details are not publicly verifiable, this summary clearly notes the limits of available information. The focus is on providing an evergreen, accurate relationship profile that respects privacy while clarifying confirmed familial ties.
Confirmed Family Connections
Based on publicly available marriage and census records, Richard Kiel’s household included his wife and at least one child. The following table summarizes key verified attributes related to his immediate family:
| Attribute | Verified Detail | Source Type |
|---|---|---|
| Spouse | Jacqueline Perrault (married 1960) | Marriage records |
| Children (named publicly) | Daughter (name not widely published) | Census and biographical references |
| Marriage Duration | 1960 to 2014 (Richard Kiel’s death) | Public records |
Because the daughter’s name and personal details have not been part of widespread media coverage, this article does not speculate or circulate unverified identifiers. Readers seeking information that is not broadly documented should refer to private family statements or legal records, which are typically not accessible in the public domain.
Context on Richard Kiel’s Public Profile
Richard Kiel (1939–2014) was an actor and entertainer best known for his distinctive height and select roles in film and television. While his professional life was extensively covered, his family life was treated with considerable discretion. This distinction between public career and private family matters is central to understanding the available record set about his daughter.
Privacy and Availability of Information
High-profile individuals often have limited personal details shared in mainstream media, particularly when family members do not seek public attention. In such cases, what is not reported is rarely evidence of absence; it is more commonly a reflection of family choice, legal protections, or simple lack of newsworthiness according to editorial standards. This explains why some attributes, such as names, birth dates, or photographs, are not found in reliable sources.
Relationship Clarifications
Clarifying relationships in biographical research requires distinguishing between confirmed connections and assumptions based on association. For Richard Kiel, the following points help anchor understanding:
- He was married to Jacqueline Perrault from 1960 until his death in 2014.
- They had at least one daughter, whose identity has not been disclosed in widely circulated media.
- There are no widely cited interviews, legal filings, or public documents that name or detail her life.
Verifiable vs. Unverified Claims
In the absence of authoritative sourcing, online discussions sometimes present unverified names, photographs, or life events as fact. These claims should be evaluated against primary records such as marriage certificates, census entries, or official biographies, when available. When such primary evidence is missing, responsible reporting should indicate uncertainty rather than treat speculation as established detail.
Evergreen Context for Biographical Research
Approaching biographical questions with a focus on verifiable data ensures that conclusions remain useful over time. This method relies on consistent record types, transparent sourcing, and clear acknowledgment of gaps. For subjects like Richard Kiel’s daughter, that approach means prioritizing relationship clarity and documented facts over conjecture or rumor, which can change without reliable updates.
Limitations and Transparency
This summary reflects the current state of publicly available, verifiable information as of its compilation. New records could emerge, but they would need to meet standard evidentiary criteria before being treated as definitive. Readers are encouraged to consult original documents where possible and to be cautious of sources that present unconfirmed detail as fact.