Prop 112 polling captures voter sentiment on a proposed constitutional amendment that would move Colorado to a 2,500-foot statewide oil and gas setback. These polls track how likely voters are to support or oppose the measure and how undecided opinions shift over time.
Understanding Prop 112 polling helps campaigns, advocates, and industry stakeholders anticipate outcomes, adjust messaging, and plan ground operations in key legislative districts and swing counties.
Methodology Behind Prop 112 Polling
Professional pollsters use probability-based samples, random-digit-dialing, and address-based outreach to ensure representation across Colorado’s urban metros and rural counties. Weighting by age, gender, region, and 2020 vote choice reduces bias and improves accuracy.
Sampling and Field Period
High-quality surveys define a clear population, set precise inclusion criteria, and report response rates alongside margin of error.
Question Design and Context
Neutral wording, balanced response options, and randomized order minimize leading and measurement error in Prop 112 questions.
| Pollster | Field Dates | Sample | Prop 112 Support | Prop 112 Opposition | Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rocky Mountain Poll | Sep 2023 | 600 adults | 48% | 39% | 13% |
| Suffolk University | Aug 2023 | 500 LV | 44% | 42% | 14% |
| CBS News/YouGov | Jul 2023 | 812 adults | 41% | 46% | 13% |
| Public Policy Polling | Jun 2 Weld County | 646 adults | 52% | 41% | 7% |
| Elway Poll | May 2023 | 400 cell | 46% | 38% | 16% |
Campaign Strategy and Messaging
Prop 112 campaigns segment audiences by proximity to existing wells, industry employment, and environmental values to tailor persuasion and volunteer deployment. Message testing around health, local control, and economic impact drives ad buys and door-knocking scripts.
Framing Health and Safety
Supporters emphasize peer-reviewed studies on air quality, truck traffic, and respiratory risks near active pads to build urgency in suburban markets.
Economic and Rural Appeals
Opposition messaging highlights royalty flows, jobs in drilling services, and county budgets to counterbalance urban health narratives in energy-dependent regions.
Legal and Regulatory Context
Prop 112 would amend Colorado’s setbacks to 2,500 feet for new wells under state jurisdiction, potentially affecting local approvals on city-county boundaries and tribal consultations.
Ballot Language and Fiscal Notes
Clear descriptions of authority shifts, administrative costs, and projected impacts on state severance tax receipts help voters assess feasibility and trade-offs.
Public Opinion Trends and Geography
Tracking by region shows urban Front Range backing the initiative more strongly than Western Slope communities where extraction is a larger share of local income.
Partisan and Demographic Divides
Younger, environmentally engaged, and Democratic-leaning voters express higher support, while older, rural, and Republican identifiers lean toward opposition or caution.
Engagement and Next Steps for Colorado Voters
- Review official ballot language and fiscal notes before casting your vote.
- Attend local candidate forums to hear direct answers on impacts to air quality and county budgets.
- Check nonpartisan voter guides that summarize scientific, economic, and legal perspectives on the setback.
- Confirm registration and polling location if you plan to vote by mail or in person on election day.
FAQ
Reader questions
How far does Prop 112 require new oil and gas wells to be set back from occupied buildings?
Prop 112 would expand the statewide setback to 2,500 feet, applying to new wells permitted under state jurisdiction.
Which parts of Colorado are most likely to be affected if Prop 112 passes?
Front Range counties with dense housing near existing drilling, as well as energy-dependent Western Slope counties, would see the greatest operational changes.
What happens to existing wells if Prop 112 is approved?
The measure typically applies only to new wells; existing compliant wells are generally grandfathered unless rules change.
How do industry groups and environmental organizations differ in their Prop 112 polling strategies?
Industry emphasizes jobs and local tax bases through paid media and field programs, while environmental groups focus on health risks via digital organizing and canvassing.