In 2018, Georgia voters considered a slate of ballot initiatives that touched on taxes, education funding, criminal justice, and constitutional amendments. These measures shaped policy debates and influenced how state and local government collected revenue and allocated resources.
Below is a detailed overview of the key contests, including official titles, legal references, fiscal notes, and policy effects. The table provides a concise snapshot for voters who wanted to compare measures at a glance.
| Official Name | Ballot Number | Subject | Estimated Fiscal Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Keep Six | Constitutional Amendment A | Criminal justice sentencing reform | Reduced prison costs over time |
| No New Taxes | Constitutional Amendment B | Tax and spending limit | Limits revenue growth from state collections |
| Use It or Lose It | Constitutional Amendment C | State budget reserve requirements | Structural change to rainy day fund |
| Local Option Sales Tax for Education | Referendum A | K–12 school funding and capital projects | New local revenue if approved |
| Teacher Retirement Benefits | Referendum B | State retirement system changes | >Pension funding adjustments |
Criminal Justice Reform Measure
Constitutional Amendment A, known as Keep Six, proposed changes to sentencing and parole eligibility for certain nonviolent offenses. Advocates argued that reducing lengthy prison terms would lower recidivism and ease prison overcrowding.
Opponents raised concerns about public safety and consistency in how crimes are categorized. The measure prompted discussion about balancing rehabilitation with accountability in the state corrections system.
Tax and Spending Limit Proposal
No New Taxes Initiative
Constitutional Amendment B aimed to cap annual state revenue growth, requiring voter approval for any new broad-based taxes. Proponents viewed this as a protection against government overreach and fiscal instability.
Critics warned that the cap could restrict funding for schools, infrastructure, and health services, particularly during economic downturns when additional revenue might be needed.
Budget Reserve Requirements
Use It or Lose It Provision
Constitutional Amendment C sought to adjust how the state’s budget reserve is funded and accessed. Supporters said it would ensure a more predictable flow of funds into savings during strong revenue years.
Detractors questioned whether the mechanism would truly stabilize finances and worried about potential limits on lawmakers’ flexibility in emergencies.
Education Funding and Teacher Benefits
Local Schools and Pension Measures
Referendum A proposed a local sales tax dedicated to K–12 education and capital projects, with revenue staying within each school district’s county. Referendum B addressed cost-of-living adjustments and benefits for teachers participating in the state retirement system.
School districts stood to gain new capital funds, while opponents debated the long-term cost to taxpayers and the adequacy of existing state support.
Key Takeaways and Next Steps
- Review official ballot language before voting to understand exact legal changes.
- Check nonpartisan analyses for fiscal estimates and potential risks.
- Follow up on implementation timelines if measures pass, as some changes require additional legislation.
- Engage with local civic organizations to deepen understanding of education and criminal justice reforms.
FAQ
Reader questions
What types of measures were on the Georgia ballot in 2018?
The ballot included constitutional amendments on criminal justice, taxes, and budget reserves, as well as referendums on education funding and teacher retirement benefits.
Did any of the 2018 measures change how Georgia handles criminal sentencing?
Yes, Constitutional Amendment A (Keep Six) proposed modifications to sentencing and parole eligibility, aiming to reduce prison time for certain nonviolent offenses.
How would the tax cap in Amendment B affect Georgia residents?
The cap would limit annual growth in state revenue, potentially restricting new funding for services unless voters approved new taxes or fee increases.
What was the purpose of the Use It or Lose It budget measure?
It aimed to reshape the state’s reserve fund rules, directing more money into savings during good revenue years and outlining clearer access during downturns.